Wednesday, December 01, 2010

Two? No. Three? Maybe. Four? Probably

I, of course, am way past this view and I'll explain below:-

Rather than an imminent two-state-solution, the reality is that a de-facto three-state solution is evolving (Israel, West Bank and Gaza). The ongoing focus on settlements obscures the truth, that until the PA becomes a functioning, united entity, a final breakthrough is not feasible.

Now, to return to my opinion, if there is a "two-state solution", the 'two states' are actually Egypt - who don't want the Gazans and never did want them within their state - and Jordan - who also do not want them even more than the Egyptians. The "solution" they want is that the Pals. should be far away from them.

I have also blogged years ago that we are now in that 'three-state' solution - Israel, Hamastan and Fatahland - and it is at least a 'four-state' solution, i.e., four states evolving out of the former Palestine Mandate: Israel, Jordan, Hamastan and Fatahland.

^

No comments: