Peretz seems to enjoy the cultural distractions and comforts of Tel Aviv.
“I’ve made Tel Aviv my locale now because in Jerusalem you wake up in the morning with the Jewish problem, and you go to sleep with the Palestinian problem,” he said. “I don’t like my life to be about politics, about religion, or about conflict.
Jerusalem is a very dour city and it doesn’t suit me. It’s a nasty place – the religious politics suffuses it, the corrupt politics suffuses it and the ideological politics suffuses it.”
Peretz added that while he hasn’t attended the Sheikh Jarrah protests in East Jerusalem, as has been reported, he does plan on going just to see for himself.
I hope he doesn't mind that "settle down" usage.
If he's contemplating a bit of political tourism, besides going to Jerusalem and seeing what goes on at the former Jewish neighborhood of Shimon HaTzaddik, - founded in the 1870s and whose Jewish residents were ethnically cleansed from the area as a result of Arab aggression launched against Jews to thwart a UN recommendation of territorial compromise, the Partition Plan of
November 29, 1947, which the Jews actually had accepted, - well, I hope he'll accept my invitation to see Shiloh and other pioneering Jewish communities in other parts of the Jewish national homeland.
We're referred to, disparagingly, as "settlements", as if we are intrusive, foreign, temporary and plain bothersome. But we do belong to this land and we have done much to prove that.
Peretz would be surprised. Dour we are not.
Marty, you coming?